Change?? What Change??

No one should be surprised that the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has dropped its investigations into the major property scams visited upon Liverpool. For many years, “Private Eye” has ridiculed this agency, describing it as the “Serious Farce Office” because of its repeated failures in dealing with major fraud cases. The reason given in the case of Liverpool – that there was insufficient evidence – strikes seasoned observers as absurd. However, what is done is done. We now must look to Merseyside Police for action. The prognosis is not good.

Local police are pursuing Operation Aloft, looking at corruption in the city council. Whether that will stretch to covering frauds which have primarily fleeced investors and contractors remains to be seen. After all, the original arrests under Operation Aloft involved Joe Anderson and a range of senior council officers none of whom have, to date, been prosecuted, never mind convicted. Given that there are twenty staff on Operation Aloft, one must wonder where this investigation is now headed.

It is worth considering another investigation, this one conducted by Lancashire Police, and known as Operation Sheridan. Their findings were, I believe, submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a decision on prosecution, over three years ago. There is still no confirmation as to what is to happen in that case.  It was this precursor to Aloft which led to the arrest of four people, three of whom had strong links at a very senior level, to Liverpool City Council, including former chief executive Ged Fitzgerald, together with Phil Halsall and David McIlhenny. As with the suspects in Operation Aloft, those involved also lost their highly paid jobs (except Tory Councillor Driver, leader of Lancashire County Council!) They all appear to be in a juridical limbo.

I have repeatedly pointed out that the push for resolving the mess in Liverpool City Council has been fragmented into three areas. We don’t know, as we have seen, where, if anywhere, the criminal justice path will lead us in effecting prosecutions and, hopefully, convictions. The national government’s intentions are wholly unclear. Jenrick has gone and Gove has taken his place as the responsible minister. Only the Caller Report remains as a blueprint for future action. Will that action be forthcoming? Then we have the Labour Party.

In some ways, the Labour Party reaction has been the most disappointing of all. It began with the fact-finding Hanson inquiry. Then came the less than enthusiastic noises off about Caller’s case for a radical overhaul of the number of wards and of councillors in the city. Liverpool Labour turkeys will not vote for Christmas. Even during this past week, many were disturbed at the outcome of the selection of candidates for vacancies in three safe Labour wards. Two of the three went to former councillors, dashing the hopes of those who hoped for an infusion of fresh political talent. There is nothing new in this merry-go-round for seats on the council, but there were expectations post Caller that a message had gone to Labour to get its own house in order. This has been seen as business as usual.

More telling of the atrophied Labour Party thinking was the appointment of Sheila Murphy to oversee local Labour parties in the city. A former party hack (I was one myself!) prior to retirement, she ended up working for former MP, Luciana Berger, and along with her apostate boss, defected from the Labour Party. Such an anti-Corbyn gesture will be long remembered by a traditionally “left” Liverpool Labour Party. As a result, there will be little faith in Ms Murphy’s political impartiality.

As Liverpool staggers on, I note that Peel’s much-vaunted Wirral Waters is now welcoming “prefabs” on site. This is far removed from the grandiose claims that were being made for this alleged Wirral showpiece. I have nothing against prefabs; I do have an objection to gross exaggeration of development claims. Also, I hear that Andy Moorhead – close political ally of Joe Anderson and former leader of Knowsley Council – has resigned his seat on Knowsley Council. Finally, the “Echo” – principally through the work of journalists Tom Duffy and Nick Tyrell – is now starting to look seriously at Scam City issues. It is a pity that the so-called political editor, Liam Thorpe, has abysmally failed to do so.

6 thoughts on “Change?? What Change??

  1. Thorpe has been captured, stripped, laid out, plucked, seasoned in toxic slime, with the journalistic code of conduct boiled out of his bones. The result is a compliant enemy within, toiling for the new Back’Anders’on.

    Like

  2. Peter,

    Merseyside Police are far too close to the council in every way, really the NCA and the City of London police should be investigating and taking Aloft and Sheridan investigations.

    Remember, the only way there were proper investigations in Rotherham over CSA was when the NCA took over from South Yorkshire Police.

    Local police forces should not be conducting investigations into councils in their own force areas, as there are too many ‘local influences’ around. I’m not saying Merseyside Police are corrupt, but they may be less zealous in their investigation than one would want.

    Reading Skwawkbox, the Labour party is a dysfunctional shambles locally regionally and nationally, long may it continue to be so.

    Like

    1. I agree with Bob’s comment above. I was part of a group that campaigned against a well-known ‘developer’ destroying an important green LCC area for £500K houses that did not come under the criterion of ‘affordable housing’. We pleaded with the local Labour councillor and MP for help. This councillor didn’t respond to emails when we made our last desperate attempts to stop the development and it was hard to describe the response from the MP as actively helpful.

      We were horrified when the truth behind the whole development was discovered and one of our members reported it to the police who took no action. Conversely – and unbeknownst to each other – we all made submissions to the Caller inquiry. One of our members asked if it did qualify for consideration and received a most positive response, although we all doubt now if anything will come out of this inquiry. Full marks, anyway, to the inquiry members for having the courtesy to reply to our submission so promptly.

      There was a very interesting article in the F.T. during the summer [1], relating to housing developers – definitely recommended reading and gives some insight as to why FTSE100/250 developers’ share prices are going through the roof at the current time. Has anyone ever met a CEO, or founder, of a development company with an interest or any concern for the environment – unless, of course, it affects them personally?

      Reference

      [1] Shubber, K, Pickard, J., Harlow, M. ‘Property donors provide one-quarter of funds given to Tory party’, Financial Times July 29th 2021
      On-line link: https://www.ft.com/content/c5737fbb-2893-4a5a-be5e-965785f1a37b

      Like

      1. That was the case in the Walton Park plans. Councillors were asked “Are you opposed to building on our green space?” “Let’s wait and see the plans” was the collective reply, Steve Rotheram included.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s