Civic Climate Challenges

Apparently, Mayor Anderson is to declare a “Climate Emergency” on the 17th of July. Now, let me state at the outset, I am supportive of all positive initiatives to address the very real dangers posed by global warming and the general neglect of our environment. I really cannot comprehend the mentality of those who are in stubborn denial when it comes to the degradation of the planet, and its effects on climate. However, what I do deplore are public relations exercises, unsupported by wide consent and a plan of action.

It will be of more than passing interest to see what is being proposed, and how the general public will be involved in the city’s attempts to do its bit at this critical time. I do recall a visit to the United States ten years ago when I was admittedly surprised at how proactive many individual states and cities were in their attempts to counter federal government inertia on the most pressing problem of our age. Therefore, recognising that this is an issue that knows no boundaries, my first question is whether Liverpool is acting in concert with sister cities throughout the country. My second question? Is there an international dimension to this initiative?

These are fundamental questions which get to the heart of things – is it a serious proposal, or perhaps well-meaning political spin ? As I say, this is an emergency which crosses all boundaries and borders. We (for there is ample evidence of radical climate change which has already occurred), our children and our grandchildren, need to be signed up to a global crusade to halt so many harmful practices which are damaging our everyday lives. Whether it is the explosion of carbon into the air or plastic into our seas, we all have a part to play.

Yet it is also about an appreciation of the natural world in and around our communities. It is part of the reason why increasing numbers of people are passionate about short-sighted attempts to monetise all of our green spaces. There is an old Arab saying which, roughly translated, says “Give me a penny, and I will spend half on bread and half on the narcissus; because bread is the food of the body and the narcissus is the food of the soul”. Perhaps that is a somewhat poetic way of expressing the need to strike a balance in all things in life.

Thus, it concerned me to discover that Liverpool’s World Heritage Status is imperilled once more. Social media is replete once again with the usual philistine comments about this. We have a city with some very special features of which we ought to be proud. It is also the case that the city – like all of its contemporary rivals – is keen to attract investment. Yet investment and maintenance of that which makes us special are not mutually exclusive. They do, however, require intelligent consideration in both the planning and the execution of development projects. That has not been the case in recent years.

For example, I have been a regular Cassandra about Peel and its grandiose claims. I make no apologies for that. Their sole objective is to make money, not to think of the wider welfare of Liverpool or the planet. Their principal business is the buying and selling of land. It does not seem to be successful at other ventures designed to increase its income. That is why they have sold off Teeside Airport as they also try to flog off Liverpool Airport. Even their stake in the Port of Liverpool is up for sale – that is, the working docks. Where dockland real estate can turn a profit, they will still jump into any old deal.

Ironically, Peel has withdrawn its proposal for a solar energy farm behind Liverpool Airport. I am confident that Halton Council would have rejected it anyway (the bulk of the proposed site was in Halton). However, this change of tack by Peel is simply about its own liquidity problems, not about the greater issues to do with climate change.

We need to take a far more comprehensive view across the whole city-region – and far beyond – if we are to have any impact on the climate change challenge. Climate issues are far, far bigger than any single company, city, or country. I look forward to a debate, therefore, open to full public participation, on July 17th.

2 thoughts on “Civic Climate Challenges

  1. It is good news for Oglet that Peel have withdrawn their planning applications to Halton and Liverpool councils, but it’s worrying they might just amend them in some way and resubmit them, and all the objections that have been logged to date would be lost. Until we know the reasons why they withdrew them, we have to remain vigilant.

    Like

  2. Interesting posting Mr. Kilfoyle and thank you. Yes, very interesting following the Peel/Intu oscillations, together with the Hammerson + Brookfield ingredients thrown in.

    Unfortunately, this mayor’s political vapour trail doesn’t suggest that environmental issues have ever floated within his intellectual reservoir. Just think Allerton Priory scandal, destruction of Bixteth Gardens, approving the removal of SAFE access to ‘Oggie’ Shore and not ensuring protection for ground nesting birds and other creatures located on this supposed new RESA area (RESA CAA recommendation: 240m length and twice runway width (min.). Runway 29 is a code 4, 45m wide runway, with a 30m Stopway – clearly didn’t require a Green Belt area of 21ha……Oh, and squeeze in a new ILS localiser)….. Continued p64.

    Supply forces appear to be winning out regarding climate change proposals. And the problem here? There is just one large copper mine left in the world, currently under development by Rio Tinto. Li, and Co – plus Rare Earth Metals – are either in limited supply or in politically sensitive areas [1]. The whole electrical infrastructure and Grid (electrical) will have to undergo a truly radical change to accommodate the energy requirements of mass electric cars. I am afraid this is just a dream.

    I have never inspected the CV’s of the current councillors, but doubt if any serious practical background in engineering or science will be detected. It is, thus, clear that PR is likely to win out as far as proposals to combat climate change are concerned.

    Time to re-read the late Gerald Leach’s: ‘A Low Energy Strategy for the UK’ [2]. Hard to believe that book was written in the 70’s.

    References
    [1] Sandeson, H. ‘The labour crisis in Congo’s Cobalt mines’, Financial Times (F.T. Big Read) 8th July 2019, p19
    [2] Leach, G. ‘A Low Energy Strategy for the UK’, Science Reviews Ltd, 1979.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s